tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6045599197167432183.post4446124410349294170..comments2023-09-28T01:34:39.258-07:00Comments on Circus Mania: Amanda Holden bitten by lion tamer Thomas ChipperfieldDouglas McPhersonhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07109848560445125859noreply@blogger.comBlogger5125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6045599197167432183.post-28237145044927497492015-10-21T13:54:21.117-07:002015-10-21T13:54:21.117-07:00On the subject of broadcasting ethics and professi...On the subject of broadcasting ethics and professionalism, though, one caveat: although Vine did a good interview, I thought he let standards slip by immediately afterwards reading out a listener's comment that abused Thomas in the foulest terms. Should the BBC provide a public platform for such a personal and offensive attack, which would probably constitute a public order offence if delivered face to face? In the old days, a presenter might have said something like "we've had a couple of comments that were too abusive to read out," which would have conveyed the commenter's strong feelings without subjecting Thomas and the rest of us to the actual tirade.Douglas McPhersonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07109848560445125859noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6045599197167432183.post-27887796962771462702015-10-21T07:36:52.045-07:002015-10-21T07:36:52.045-07:00Thanks for your comment, D. That's a great poi...Thanks for your comment, D. That's a great point about the amounts celebs are paid to support various organisations. It's something they should be asked to declare whenever they speak to the media, a bit like MPs declaring a personal interest in a subject.<br />Shame Jeremy Vine didn't include a correction about Thomas' mother (unless he did by the end of the show; I didn't listen to the end, but I was hoping someone would have told him and that he would have said something after the news at the latest.) Other than that, though, full marks for Vine giving Thomas a nice respectful interview.Douglas McPhersonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07109848560445125859noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6045599197167432183.post-6013993542773812222015-10-21T07:27:39.757-07:002015-10-21T07:27:39.757-07:00You're right, Chris, it was totally unethical ...You're right, Chris, it was totally unethical for Amanda Holden to use her position as a presenter to attack Thomas on behalf of Born Free. Luckily snapping, snarling predators hold no fear for a Chipperfield. I keep imagining him reaching out of that video screen and pacifying Holden with a lump of pork on the end of a stick! Good to hear Jeremy Vine doing a proper interview with Thomas on R2 today and for once not choosing to make it a debate with an animal rights spokesperson.Douglas McPhersonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07109848560445125859noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6045599197167432183.post-87114279196795025412015-10-21T01:57:49.275-07:002015-10-21T01:57:49.275-07:00Thank you, D Thomas! I've just added this mes...Thank you, D Thomas! I've just added this message to Amanda Holden's page on Facebook:<br />Amanda behaved badly towards someone she was supposed to be interviewing. Her producers are also at fault in allowing her to take this interview - as a declared activist for an organisation which opposes having animals in circuses, she is not suitable to interview from a neutral position. But, for a moment, set aside the emotion and look at the facts. Whenever neutral scientists (I mean scientists who aren't in the pay of an activist organisation) study the physical and the psychological condition of animals in circuses, they conclude that all is well. The 'evidence' put forward by such as Born Free and Animal Defenders deliberately misquotes research and distorts the truth - one world-class expert cited in such literature complained to a UK government minister that his work had been 'egregiously misquoted'. Why do they do that? Not because they are active in 'helping animals', as many supporters and donors believe! It's almost entirely in the interest of their bank balances. Animal Defenders is a commercial Limited Company, not an 'animal welfare charity' as they encourage people to think. Others spend far more on executive salaries than they do on working with real live animals and giving actual help. People like Thomas Chipperfield devote their lives to caring for their animals. They run their businesses, usually on a shoe-string, not as a get-rich-quick con, but so that they can go on doing what they love doing. Those who wish to support 'animal welfare', as opposed to the often-sinister philosophies of 'animal rights', would do better to stick up for such as Mr Chipperfield. Chris Barltrophttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08312227879539002934noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6045599197167432183.post-136036763507469122015-10-20T16:22:41.918-07:002015-10-20T16:22:41.918-07:00Oh thank God for the voice of reason. I have seen...Oh thank God for the voice of reason. I have seen the show 3 times, turned up unexpectedly to ask how the big cats were kept and was immediately shown the enclosures where they live and where they exercise. I got to know the family over a few weeks and they deserve credit not just for their work but how every single one of them have remained calm, respectful and pleasant against the tirade of abuse and lies about them. The first time I attended there were protesters on a hot day who had left their dogs in their cars. Thomas was clearly worried about them and offered water which was refused, even after he brought bottles with unbroken seals. They said he had probably laced them with poison. It is obvious that Thomas had a good upbringing the way he kept apologising to Amanda Holden even though she was so venomous towards him in her unprofessional attack. <br /><br />Far too many celebrities are riding on the back of charities pretending to care when in fact most of them charge for appearing, and even on Children in Need they get paid. Having founded the charity MAMAA 21 years ago I have lost count how many celebrities we approached for help - hundreds of them. They either wanted large sums of money to appear or it was too controversial to help. The only people who helped us free of charge were Tony Hadley, Paul Ross, Noddy Holder, Sean Williamson, Lorraine Kelly and David Dimbleby. <br /><br />Today I have seen many people accusing Thomas's mother of being charged with cruelty to animals when it fact that was a distant cousin Mary who died over a year ago. Everyone is entitled to an opinion but they need to get their facts right first. If someone in your family commits murder does that make the entire family murderers too.<br /><br />Well done the Thomas for reminding her of her double standards. If they had let him speak they would have learned a lot and if they did their research they would know that the safari park at Longleat house - the first in the world outside of Africa was the brainchild of Thomas's Grandfather<br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br />Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10855462529052191915noreply@blogger.com